Moore v. California State Board of Accountancy
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
*1025MOSK, J.
I dissent. The majority opinion not only violates the intent of the Accountancy Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 5000 et seq.),1 as Justice George’s dissent points out, but it also violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, section 2(a) of the California Constitution.
On the first of these issues, the State Board of Accountancy (Board) in issuing regulations to effectuate the Accountancy Act (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 16, § 2, hereinafter Regulation 2) prohibits what the statute permits. That is, section 5052 allows nonlicensed persons to offer basic accounting…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Peel v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Short v. RiedellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Florida Accountants Association v. DandelakeSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.