Legal Opinion
Public Service Electric & Gas v. Uphold
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 19, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
WECKER, J.A.D.
Defendant Prudential appeals from a summary judgment declaring that it owes coverage to defendant Jeffrey Uphold because its attempt to cancel an automobile insurance policy issued to *170Uphold was ineffective.1 Summary judgment was simultaneously entered against Uphold in favor of plaintiff Public Service Electric & Gas on its suit against him for damages resulting after his automobile collided with a PSE & G utility pole. PSE & G’s claimed damages were $4,620.20.2 Prudential denied coverage for the March 22, 1996, accident, claiming that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weathers v. Hartford Insurance GroupSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Celino v. General Acc. Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Hodges v. Pennsylvania Nat. Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Lilly v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Valley National Bancorporation v. American Motorists InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lee v. AIG Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Luizzi v. PRO TRANSPORT INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008