Legal Opinion
Santana v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 9, 2016No. 14-689CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Military Pay Act, 37 U.S.C. § 204; Military Whistleblower Protection Act, 10 U.S.C. § 1034; Lack of Jurisdiction; Administrative Remedies
FIRESTONE, Senior Judge
OPINION
Plaintiff Lieutenant Commander (“LCDR”) Celeste Santana filed a complaint in this court under the Military Pay Act, 37 U.S.C. § 204, alleging that she was improperly separated from the Navy. The case is now before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record (“MJAR”) pursuant to Rule 52.1 of the Rules of the Court of.Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Gov’t’s MJAR, ECF No. 21; Pl.’s MJAR, ECF No. 32.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jackson v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bias v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Baude v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- McClellan v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Santana v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.