Legal Opinion
United States v. Rohde
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided December 22, 1960No. Civ. No. 741PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, District Judge.
The plaintiff’s action against the defendant is predicated on the theory that he improperly procured payments from the United States Government under the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944 (38 U.S.C. 696 et seq.) from February through October 1947, by representing that he was self-employed when in fact he wasn’t. Sought, in the case, is a judgment for the total of those payments and interest thereon at the legal rate.
Under this record it is conclusively established: (1) that the defendant wasn’t self-employed at the time he applied for those payments and when he got…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- DiSilvestro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. MacIociDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1972
- United States v. OxnerDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1964
- Joseph W. Disilvestro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Wiley's Cove RanchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.