United States v. MacIoci
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETTINE, Chief Judge,
This action is before the court for decision on the pleadings, memoranda of law and a stipulation of facts. The United States seeks to recover alleged overpayments of Veterans Administration compensation benefits from the defendant, guardian of Frank T. Rose, an incompetent veteran. The pleadings and joint stipulation of facts leaving no genuine issue as to any material fact, the matter is properly before the court on the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. It will be so treated.
The stipulated facts establish that the defendant is attorney-guardian of Frank T.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Bank of the MetropolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ziviak v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
- Disabled American Veterans v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- United States v. GarrahanDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1985