Legal Opinion

Cavers v. HOUSTON MCLANE CO., INC.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 30, 2008No. Docket: WCB-08-14PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Houston McLane Co., Inc., d/b/a the Houston Astros Baseball Club, a Texas corporation, appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer (Jerome, HO) determining that the Board has personal jurisdiction over the Houston Astros on Eric D. Cavers’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits. The Astros contend that the exercise of personal jurisdiction in this case violates due process because the only contact the Ast-ros had with Maine was a visit by its Director of Scouting to negotiate and sign Cavers’s minor league baseball contract. We affirm.

I. CASE HISTORY

[¶ 2]…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Labbe v. Nissen Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Emma B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. Fore, LLC v. BenoitSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. Youngquist Brothers Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Youngquist Brothers Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Dennis R. Di Ricco; Golden Genesis, INC. d/b/a Nuplasma; Thomas F. Casey v. Missouri Commissioner of SecuritiesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API