Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dryden v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 9, 1988No. 2 CA-CV 87-0088PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Chief Judge.

Robert M. Dryden and Lauralee Dryden, husband and wife, appeal from a jury verdict and award in the amount of $8,591.00 against Samuel Bell and Mita Bell, and from a defense verdict in favor of Dale Naegle, arising from the design, construction and sale of 34 acres of land with improvements. Drydens brought an action against Bells for breach of contract, misrepresentation, breach of express and implied warranties, conversion, negligence, and consumer fraud. In addition, Drydens brought an action against Naegle, the architect, for defective design. The trial court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hartley v. BallouSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Arizona Management Corp. v. KallofCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. v. VickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Resolution Trust Corp. v. BlasdellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1994
  3. Dorman v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API