Legal Opinion

Merkley v. MacPherson's, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1966No. 38622PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Poyhonen, J. †

The appellant, as respondents’ real estate agent, undertook for compensation to find a buyer for respondents’ apartments. In due time appellant presented to respondents for signature an earnest money receipt and agreement, representing that it had found buyers and that appellant had received from the buyers, and was holding, a demand promissory note payable to respondents in the amount of $2,700 as earnest money.

When the respondents and the buyers met at the offices of the escrow agent for the purpose of completing the sale, the buyers refused to proceed further, giving as their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Guy Stickney, Inc. v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Farrell v. ScoreWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Paulsell v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Rushing v. StephanusWashington Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. Wardley Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Monty v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Roy H. Long Realty Company, Inc. v. VanderkolkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Mueller v. Staples & Son Fruit Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. Lacoille v. DulongMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API