Legal Opinion

Guy Stickney, Inc. v. Underwood

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1966No. 37711PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

— This lawsuit involves a controversy about the meaning and legal effect to be given certain language of an earnest money receipt and agreement. The fact pattern of the underlying real estate transaction was before us in Underwood v. Sterner, 63 Wn.2d 360, 387 P.2d 366 (1963). Therein, the defendant-purchaser, Joseph P. Sterner, appealed from a judgment of $50,000 entered in the trial court in favor of the plaintiff-vendor, Lucy N. Underwood. The plaintiff had sued for damages arising from the defendant’s breach of a contract to purchase the plaintiff’s commercial property.

We affirmed the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wise v. FardenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Underwood v. SternerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Rushing v. StephanusWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Crosthwaite v. CrosthwaiteWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. West & Wheeler v. LongtinWashington Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Scott Galvanizing, Inc. v. Northwest EnviroServices, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. McNutt v. KeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. Mendez v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Murray v. Western Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API