Legal Opinion
United States v. Edmund M. Connery
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1989No. 87-3508PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HACKETT, District Judge.
The United States appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, granting defendant’s motion for acquittal pursuant to F.R. Crim.P. 29(c). Appellant contends that when the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the government, a reasonable jury could have found defendant Edmund M. Connery guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. After a thorough review of the voluminous record in this case, we must find that the jury had sufficient evidence to sustain its verdict. We therefore reverse the judgment of the district court and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Buenaventura Martinez, Juan Martinez, Jaime B. Salcedo, United States of America v. Manuel Suarez-O'neillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. John F. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Bobby C. McDougaldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. James Douglas Defranco (91-4148) John Renforth (91-4165) Penny Defranco (91-4153) and Raymond Defranco, Sr. (91-4149)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. David Eugene Ricketts Donald Lee SwackhammerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. BecknerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- In Re GridleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.