Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 7, 1949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff sought an injunction prohibiting the defendants from making any use in the courts of this state, and particularly in certain proceedings pending in the Probate Court for the district of Darien, of a decree of a Surrogate Court in New York giving her son in adoption, and, if necessary, a declaratory judgment as to the validity of the adoption proceedings. The defendants named in the writ are two brothers and a sister of the plaintiff and Charles A. Mulligan, Jr., the husband of the sister. The trial court found that the decree of the New York court had been procured by fraud…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Reiley v. HealeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Folwell v. HowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Miller v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Iffland Lumber Co. v. TuckerConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
  2. State v. WaterhouseConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964
  3. City Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. SeftelConnecticut Superior Court · 1949
  4. Goldfeld v. Wood Park Estates, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1971
  5. Iffland Lumber Co. v. TuckerConnecticut Superior Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API