Legal Opinion

Baum v. Somerville Water Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 18, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Walker, Chancellor.

On the afternoon of July 8th, 1909, plaintiff’s stove factory and warehouse at Somerville *612were destroyed by fire. Within the door oE the warehouse plaintiff had a coil of fire hose, equipped with nozzle and coupling. Directly in front of the door war. a fire hydrant owned by the defendant company-: also a similar hydrant on the plaintiff’s grounds, with hose attached. Rising from the roof of the iron works was a stand pipe, which was equipped with a fire hose. At the time of the fire, the hose from the hydrants, and stand pipe was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morhart v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  2. Turner v. KuehnleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. DingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Atlas Finishing Co. v. Hackensack Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  3. Bongo v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  4. Clay v. Catlettsburg, Kenova & Ceredo Water Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  5. Franklin Mutual Insurance v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API