Legal Opinion

Turner v. Kuehnle

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 9, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On demurrer to MR.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

This is a suit for dower.

The complainant, as the widow of Richard BE. Turner, deceased, demands dower in some valuable real estate in Atlantic *62City, of which her husband was seized in his lifetime, and which came by conveyance, in which she did not join, to the defendant, who is in possession of the same.

The defendant claims that her dower is barred by the proceedings of foreclosure and sale under a mortgage which was paramount to her husband’s title, and to which proceedings she was made a party.

She sets out in her bill and challenges the binding effect upon her of the decree in…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. KoslofskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Public Service Gas Co. v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  3. Davis v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Baum v. Somerville Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  5. Brittingham v. Huyler'sNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API