Legal Opinion

Atlas Finishing Co. v. Hackensack Water Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 10, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ackebson, S. C. 0.

The complaint in this action is in three counts and the answer reserves the right to object, on or before the trial, that each of said counts fails to set forth a cause of action.

The matter now comes before me upon a motion pursuant to rule 40 of this court to determine the questions thus raised before the trial. The plaintiff in its brief expressly abandons the second and third counts, so they will be stricken out.

The first count alleges in substance that on June 23d, 1921, the defendant w'as a “public utility,” as defined in “An act concerning public utilities, to create a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. House v. Houston Waterworks CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Britton v. Green Bay & Fort Howard Water Works Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Niehaus Bros. Co. v. Contra Costa Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Trustees of Jennie DePauw Memorial Methodist Episcopal Church v. New Albany Water WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. DingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Rose v. Sapulpa Rural Water Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Consolidated Biscuit Co. v. Illinois Iowa Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  4. Bongo v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  5. Clay v. Catlettsburg, Kenova & Ceredo Water Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API