Legal Opinion
Kyle v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 26, 1979No. Nos. 79-1307, 79-1345 and 79-1505PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion per curiam.
2Per curiam
In these cases, three federal employees have petitioned for review of the final orders of the Merit Systems Protection Board upholding agency adverse personnel actions. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because the savings provision of the Civil Service Reform Act precludes direct review in this court.
I
The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111, which became effective on January 11, 1979, provides for review of final orders or decisions of the Merit Systems Protection Board in the Court of Claims or a United States Court of Appeals, 5 U.S.C.A.…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Miller v. YouakimSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
4Cited by17 opinions
- Wilder v. ProkopCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Nibali v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Department of the Air Force v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, American Federation of Government Employees, Amicus Curiae on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Montgomery v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Karahalios v. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center PresidioDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.