Pickens v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
BRIAN QUINN, Justice.
Robert Pickens (appellant) appeals his conviction for evading detention through four issues. The first two concern whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence while the last two involve the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence underlying the jury’s verdict. We affirm the judgment.
Background
While returning from a call and at around 9:00 a.m., Officer Calvillo observed a pickup truck parked in an alley behind a house. It was raining, misty, and cloudy at the time, and no one was seen around the vehicle. The officer nonetheless continued…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Sims v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Amador Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015
- Brady C. Dillard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
- Brady C. Dillard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
- Calhoun, Leroy Jr.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Carlos Rene Vidana v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.