Legal Opinion

City of Bay City v. State Board of Tax Administration

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1940No. Docket No. 150, Calendar No. 40,840PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

The city of Bay City and 17 other cities and villages have joined as plaintiffs in the hill of complaint filed herein. They seek a declaratory decree as to the rights and duties of the parties to this suit in the particulars hereinafter stated. With the exception of two, each of plaintiffs owns and operates within its boundaries 'an electric light plant. The other two municipalities own and operate within their respective boundaries artificial gas plants. In addition to its electric light plant the city of Lansing also manufactures and distributes within the city limits steam for heating…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Youngblood v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. C. F. Smith Co. v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. In Re Lewis' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Gaylord v. Gaylord City ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Appeal of Pine Bluffs v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People Ex Rel. Wayne Prosecuting Attorney v. SillMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Milk Marketing Board v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API