Legal Opinion
Milk Marketing Board v. Johnson
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1940No. Docket 2, Calendar 41,090; Docket 1, 3, Calendar 41,059, 41,156PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, C. J.
Plaintiff Johnson was granted a writ of certiorari to review Orders 3 and 4 of the Michigan milk marketing board, which determined the existence of an emergency and fixed wholesale and retail prices of milk within the Detroit milk marketing area.
After the entry of order No. 3, the board filed a bill of complaint in Wayne circuit seeking to restrain Johnson and his agents from violating amended order No. 2. During the hearing on the chancery matter, Johnson agreed to submit to the licensing provisions of the milk marketing act, Act No. 146, Pub. Acts 1939 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, §5394-41 et…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Dation v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Sponick v. Detroit Police DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Evans v. United States Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Kachian v. Optometry Examining BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.