Legal Opinion
United States v. Baxt
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 8, 1999No. Criminal 99-75PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge.
This case requires me to consider the circumstances in which a defendant may introduce expert testimony concerning his alleged mental infirmities to demonstrate that he lacked the requisite mens rea to commit the crime charged. On February 19, 1999, Defendant, Paul Baxt (“Baxt”), was indicted for misrepresenting his financial assets on loan applications submitted to Summit Trust Company (“Summit Trust”) in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014 and 2. 1 See Indictment (filed Feb. 19, 1999). The alleged offenses occurred in February and May, 1989. See id.; Aff. Dr.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Willie George ChildressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Karen CameronCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Pohlot, StephenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. John G. Bennett, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Jerome Williams, United States of America v. Zachary Marshall, United States of America v. Darryl PriceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. MisterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- DORNICK v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- United States v. AndrewsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- United States v. PendergraftDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2000