Legal Opinion

Prophet v. Vickers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1992No. 73907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SIMMS, Justice:

Chester Prophet filed a claim in March, 1988, for workers’ compensation benefits for cumulative effect loss of hearing resulting from his employment with Vickers. Claimant had worked for Vickers for some twenty years, seventeen of which he was employed as a machinist. His date of last exposure to the workplace noise was November, 1986. In the 1970’s, after working for Vickers for six or seven years, Prophet’s hearing was tested by an audiogram while serving with the National Guard. The technician performing the test informed him that he had sustained…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Coy v. Dover Corp./Norris DivisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Williams Co. v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Bodine v. Crane CarrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. PFL Life Insurance Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Oklahoma Petroleum Workers' Compensation Ass'n v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Tell v. City of PerryCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Whiteside v. Braden Manufacturing LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Cummings v. Jones Truck LinesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API