Legal Opinion

In re Jones

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 1, 1946No. 5154PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’Connell, Judge,

delivered- the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner who finally rejected, as lacking invention over the prior art, all of the claims in appellants’ application for a patent.for'thermoplastic coating compositions and articles produced therewith.

The claims on appeal sufficiently describe the alleged invention. They read-:

14. A composition of matter substantially free of ingredients volatile at ordinary room temperatures, which is solid, flexible, marproof,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re StoverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. In Re ThuauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  3. In re ReplogleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  4. In re SpenglerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Emsig Manufacturing Co. v. Merit PlasticsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
  2. Application of Boyd J. Sevold, of the Estate of Alexander D. Jidich, Also Known as Alexander Djidics, DeceasedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API