Legal Opinion
Emsig Manufacturing Co. v. Merit Plastics
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 24, 1966No. 61 C 411PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DOOLING, District Judge.
Plaintiff has sued for infringement-of its patent (Dangelmajer, U. S. Patent No. 2,643,983) on a composition of matter useful in compression molding of buttons and other articles in which a “mother-of-pearl” appearance of light reflected from depth (“integral sheen”) is-desired. It has been concluded that plaintiff’s patent is invalid and that defendants’ practice did not infringe. Separate findings of fact and conclusions of law have been made.
For many reasons, in the period since-the start of World War II plastic buttons (and other articles) have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Le Roy v. TathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Emsig Manufacturing Co. v. Merit PlasticsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Emsig Manufacturing Company v. Merit Plastics, Brofman MacHinery Corp., and Jules FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967