Fernandez v. Fernandez
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
A wife living apart from her husband sued in replevin to recover certain of her chattels that he held, and damages for their detention. The trial court sustained the husband’s demurrer to the declaration on the ground that the wife could not sue her husband at law, but must go into equity to obtain the return of the property. The appeal is from the judgment for the husband for costs.
Replevin is an action ex delicto founded upon a tortious detention of chattels, for which damages may be allowed. Despite the passage in 1898 of the Married Women’s Act, Code, 1951, Art. 45, Sec. 5 (hereinafter…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- David v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- Furstenburg v. FurstenburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Riegger v. Bruton Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Gregg v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Boblitz v. BoblitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Kline v. AnsellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Lusby v. LusbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Frye v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Ennis v. DonovanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.