Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 22, 1998No. 88 CIV. 4486(DNE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This matter is an appeal from the Election Appeal Master’s decision dated May 15,1998, 98 Elec.App. 349 (KC) (“EAM Decision”), affirming in all respects the Election Officer’s decision dated April 27, 1998, PR-035EOH (Post-47-EOH) (“EO Decision”).
Background
The EO Decision arose out of a protest filed by the slate of Ron Carey (“Carey”) on May 16, 1997, and supplemented on May 30, 1997. The protest alleged that James P. Hoffa (“Hoffa”) and members of his slate failed to make mandatory disclosures on Campaign Contributions and Expenditure Reports…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- City of Rocklin v. Sierra Lakes ReserveSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, James P. HoffaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, William Carothers and Ken MeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999