Legal Opinion

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 19, 1999No. 88 CIV. 4486(DNE)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by the United States of America against, inter alia, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT” or “the union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board (“GEB”). The settlement is embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (“Consent Decree”). The goals of the Consent Decree are to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of organized crime and establish a culture of democracy within the union. The long history of this case has been set forth in this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Afl-Cio, Ron CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Hodgson v. Chain Service Restaurant, Luncheonette & Soda Fountain Employees Union, Local 11District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  4. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API