Intercontinental Life Ins. Co. v. Lindblom
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Our previous opinion in this case has been reported at571 So.2d 1092. In that opinion we remitted a judgment of $3,012,400 to $1,000,000. The defendant insurer sought review by the United States Supreme Court. On March 4, 1991, while review of this case was pending in the United States Supreme Court, that Court held, in another case on review from this Court, that mechanisms providing for trial and appellate review of punitive damages awards in Alabama were sufficient to ensure that a judgment based on a jury's verdict of $1,040,000 in punitive…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaslipSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Patricia Stephenson Eichenseer v. Reserve Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. McKinnon Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- N.W. Mut. Life Ins. v. SheridanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Barnett v. Funding Plus of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Duck Head Apparel Co., Inc. v. HootsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.