Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company (hereinafter "Pacific Mutual"), appeals from judgments, entered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiffs, Cleopatra Haslip, Cynthia Craig, Alma Calhoun, and Eddie Hargrove.
All four plaintiffs are employees of Roosevelt City (hereinafter the "City"), a small incorporated community in western Jefferson County. As many small communities do, Roosevelt City allowed its employees to purchase a group health insurance policy through the municipality. Originally that policy was issued by Blue Cross-Blue Shield. Some months prior to 1981,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- INDUSTRIAL CHEMICAL AND FIBERGLASS CORP. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- National States Ins. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Andrew Jackson Life Ins. Co. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Seltzer v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Fibreboard Corp. v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Henderson by Hartsfield v. Alabama PowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.