Legal Opinion

Beveridge v. King

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1982No. CA 16889, SC 27693PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

Plaintiffs commenced this action more than two but less than six years after their cause accrued. The issue is whether the action is barred by the two-year statute of limitations prescribed in ORS 12.110(1):

“An action for * * * any injury to the person or rights of another, not arising on contract, and not especially enumerated in this chapter [ORS ch 12], shall be commenced within two years; * *

We hold that the cause is not barred.

It is not disputed that defendant was a builder of residential homes and that in 1975 plaintiffs entered into a written contract with defendant for the purchase of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ashmun v. NicholsOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Dowell v. MossbergOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Bales for Food, Inc. v. PooleOregon Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Kingsmen Plastering, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Riverview Condominium Ass'n v. Cypress Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Cabal v. DonnellyOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Union County School District No. 1 v. Valley Inland Pacific Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Goodwin v. Kingsmen Plastering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API