Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael K. Hebeka
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 16, 1996No. 95-3040PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.
This case is before the court on appeal for the second time. The defendant, Michael Hebeka, was originally charged and convicted under a three-count indictment with food-stamp fraud. See United States v. Hebeka, 796 F.Supp. 268 (N.D.Ohio 1992)(Hebeka I). On the initial appeal, we determined that conviction under both Counts 1 and 2 of the indictment violated the Double Jeopardy Clause and suggested that the district court should also “consider whether a consecutive sentence as to Count 3 is authorized under double jeopardy analysis.” United States v. Hebeka, 25 F.3d…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Jeffers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. James F. MooredCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. James E. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Kenneth R. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Gene B. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Joe Douglas HeltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Lawrence Orlando, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.