Legal Opinion

Burrowes v. Skibbe

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. The cause was submitted to a jury and a verdict returned in favor of plaintiff for $8,000. From a judgment based thereon the defendant appeals.

Defendant asserts error in the overruling of objection to the following question asked Dr. Frank M. Taylor, as expert witness on behalf of the plaintiff: “From your examination of the patient, would you say her complaints are fanciful or real?” The doctor answered, “I think they are real.” There is no dispute as to the qualifications of the witness to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reid v. Yellow Cab Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Miller v. DumonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Van House v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Vale v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Marion v. B. G. Coon Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Eickmann v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Tycer v. HartsellOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. McCauley v. Pacific Atlantic Steamship Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Campanale v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API