Legal Opinion

Tycer v. Hartsell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1948PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff on January 5, 1946, at the intersection of North Denver avenue and North Lombard street in the city of Portland, when she was struck by an automobile driven by the defendant. North Denver avenue runs in a northerly and southerly direction. North Lombard street runs in an easterly and westerly direction. This intersection was controlled by traffic lights for vehicles and pedestrians. Pedestrian lights indicated “Walk” and “Wait.” The accident occurred about seven o’clock in the evening and it was dark and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Maynard v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Penn v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hill v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Burrowes v. SkibbeOregon Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGESOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Baden v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hazard v. SallesOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Fox v. FlescherOregon Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API