Haas v. Haas

Seitz, Chancellor:

This court previously ruled that the pleading of the intervening defendant, Central Bank and Trust Company (“Bank”), stated a claim entitling it to relief in the form of an equitable lien against certain General Motors stock certificates up to the full amount of its loss. See Haas v. Haas, 35 DelCh. 392, 119 A.2d 358.1 Thereafter, the Bank amended its pleading, without objection, *3to contend first that it was an actual purchaser or, alternatively, that it had an equitable lien on the certificates in the full amount of its loss, including interest and counsel fees. After…