Legal Opinion
Haas v. Haas
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 20, 1958No. Civ. A. Nos. 1757, 1794, 1808, 1838PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This matter is a confused and confusing consolidation, by agreement, of four actions — two being instituted in this Court by the husband and two instituted in Delaware Courts by the wife and removed to this Court. The jurisdiction of each is based on diversity of citizenship. The wife, Arle E. Haas, will be referred to herein as “plaintiff” and Leon V. Haas as “defendant”. The parties, Leon V. Haas and Arle E. Haas, were respectively husband and wife living in or near Wilmington, Delaware. Trouble between them of a very serious nature developed about 1950 and culminated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- McLouth Steel Corp. v. Mesta MacHine Co. Foster v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (Landis Tool Co., Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Hurd v. HughesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1920
- Colton v. WadeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
- Heitz v. SayersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Asker v. AskerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979