Legal Opinion

Scott v. McEwing

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1939No. Appeal, 306PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Barnes,

On March 15, 1939, five days before the return day, defendant was served with an alias writ of summons and a copy of plaintiffs’ statement of claim in trespass. Judgment was entered against him on April 3, 1939, for want of an appearance, and, on April 8, he filed a petition and rule to open the judgment.

The petition sets forth that on the day of service, defendant delivered the writ and statement to the office of the Manufacturers’ Casualty Insurance Company, his insurance carrier; that they were mislaid by the company in its claims department; that on March 28,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fuel City Mfg. Co. v. Waynesburg Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Commonwealth v. J. & A. Moeschlin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. National Finance Corp. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Planters Nut & Chocolate Co. v. Brown-Murray Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Cinnaminson Park Co. v. LawsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Colley v. BazellOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Fox v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Smith v. DaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API