Olsen v. North Pacific Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon.
1Opinion of the Court
McKENNA, Circuit Justice.
The parties were, respectively, plaintiff and defendant in the court below, and we will so designate them. The plaintiff sued to recover damages for injuries sustained in the sawmill of the defendant. The ground of action was the incompetency and negligence of one of the defendant’s employés, to wit, one Riley Rearick, sawyer in its mill. The facts are substantially that at the time of the injury to the plaintiff the defendant conducted a sawmill in Portland, Or., and that one Riley Rearick and the plaintiff were co-employés, the one as sawyer, and the other as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Monahan v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reed v. Ridout's Ambulance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Tatum v. CrabtreeMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
- Hammontree v. Cobb Const. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1934
- Blust v. Pacific Telephone Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Potlatch Lumber Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.