Legal Opinion

People v. Solzak

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 29, 1984No. 82-1724PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGILLICUDDY

On January 31, 1982, Bette Solzak was arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol. At a hearing to determine whether her driver’s license should be suspended, pursuant to Illinois’ implied consent statute (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1982 Supp., ch. 95 Va, par. 11 — 501.1), Ward Rhentgen, the arresting officer, testified that Solzak had refused his request that she submit to a chemical test to determine the alcohol content of her blood. Solzak testified that she did not remember anything. The trial court ruled that Solzak had not knowingly refused the request and, accordingly, there was no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hoban v. RiceOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Department of Highways v. NormandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Kaufman v. State, Dept. of Pub. Safety, Driv. Lic. Div.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. WegielnikIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. CarlyleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. People v. GoodmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. People v. KirbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. People v. PorrettaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API