Legal Opinion

People v. Porretta

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 18, 1984No. 2-83-0759PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reinhard

The State appeals a finding of “no probable cause” by the trial court in an “implied-consent” hearing held pursuant to section 11—501.1(c) of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 951/2, par. 11—501.1(c)) following the arrest of defendant, James R. Porretta, for driving while under the influence of alcohol (DUI) under a city of Naperville ordinance.

The issue on appeal is whether, upon the trial court’s finding that defendant was incapable of refusing to take a breathalyzer test, the court erred in further determining that the State then should have administered a blood test…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RolfingsmeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. MalloyIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. KissAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. People v. SolzakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. People v. HorbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. CarlyleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. People v. GuptonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. People v. MontelongoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. People v. RipplingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. People v. ElledgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API