Legal Opinion
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Welker
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 24, 1992No. Civ. A. S 91-3333PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SMALKIN, District Judge.
This civil case is before the Court on defendants’ (Robert Henry Duhamell and Elmer E. Welker) motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (hereinafter “Nationwide”) instituted this diversity action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, seeking a declaratory judgment. Specifically, the purpose of this action is to determine whether certain insurance policies, issued to Mr. Duhamell and Mardel Trucking Company (hereinafter “Mardel Trucking”) by Nationwide, provide coverage for a December 1, 1986…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller v. Pacific Shore FundingDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- AFA Enterprises, Inc. v. American States InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994
- Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. C.J.H., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Haagen-Dazs Shoppe Co., Inc. v. BornDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Aerotek, Inc. v. ObercianDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.