Legal Opinion

Tonopah Ralston Mining Co. v. Mt. Oddie United Mines Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1926No. 2713PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Coleman, C. J.:

Appellant, which was the defendant below, made application to the United States land office for a patent to the Sarah lode mining claim, situated in the Tonopah mining district. The respondent filed in the land office an adverse claim to the ground for which patent was sought under the Sarah location. The ground was claimed by respondent pursuant to the location of the K. C. No. 2, K. C. Fraction, and K. C. Fraction D lode mining claims, and in due time it instituted this suit in support of the adverse claim thus filed. Judgment was rendered in favor of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Perego v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Golden Fleece G. & S. M. Co. v. Cable Consolidated G. & S. M. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1877
  4. McGinnis v. EgbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  5. Burke v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowen v. Sil-Flo CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API