Legal Opinion

Merchants Packing Co. v. Rogan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 24, 1935No. Nos. 7978-7985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In these cases the trial court granted a temporary injunction, and alter our decision in the Fisher Flouring Mills Cases, 78 F.(2d) 889, involving the processing tax on flour, vacated the injunction and denied an application for a supersedeas pending appeal by the following order: “That, in view of the action had and taken by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the matter of petitions submitted to it for injunction pending appeal in matters involving processing taxes under the act of Congress popularly known as Agricultural Adjustment Act [7 USCA § 601 et…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fisher Flouring Mills Co. v. VierhusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rieder v. RoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1935
  2. Union Packing Co. v. RoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
  3. A. P. W. Paper Co. v. RileyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1935
  4. Kingan & Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1935
  5. Woner v. LewisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API