Legal Opinion
Gruner v. Blakeman
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 19, 1981No. Civ. H-81-342PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER
CLARIE, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff has moved to remand this case to the state court on the grounds that the removal was untimely and that requisite diversity of citizenship does not exist. Three of the defendants oppose such action, and have moved for an order transferring the case to the Eastern District of New York on the grounds that the action could have been brought there in the first place and that the interest of justice and the convenience of the parties would be best served thereby. The Court finds merit in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gilardi v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1960
- Warren Bros. v. Community Building Corp. of Atlanta, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1974
- Avco Corp.(Lycoming Div.) v. Local 1010 of International U.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- Application of BlakemanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
3Cited by12 opinions
- Delgado v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Green v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Doe v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Johansen v. Employee Benefit Claims, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- Smith v. Bally's HolidayDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.