Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Mailhebuau

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 12370PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

At the time of submission of this cause on the merits there was also submitted a motion to dismiss the appeal, which is from an order, purporting to be one in probate, giving to the respondent the right to assert and file a mechanic’s lien against 'certain real property belong ing to the estate and to authorize the institution of proceedings to foreclose such lien.

The claim of respondent is that appeals from orders in probate are controlled by subdivision 3 of section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure and that no provision can be found therein authorizing the appeal here attempted.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. County of Los Angeles v. WinansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. Estate of CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. In Re Estate of AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. In Re Estate of FunkensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schlyen v. SchlyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Linstead v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Bryant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Guardianship of LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Estate of GrussingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API