In Re Estate of Allen
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying an application for relief from the consequences of the failure to prepare a bill of exceptions, within the time allowed by law. James C. Rives, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Hattie E. Allen, widow of the decedent, appealed from an order denying her petition for a decree that a homestead had vested in her. We have just given judgment affirming the order. (Estate of Allen, ante, p. 354, [165 Pac. 1010].) The opinion filed on that appeal shows that no reporter ’s transcript or hill of exceptions was brought up.
The present appeal has to do with the petitioner’s effort to secure such bill of exceptions. It appears that, for some reason, she failed to propose her bill within the time allowed, and then, upon due notice, applied to the court, under section 473 of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re BauquierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re the Estate of WiardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Estate of CalahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Estate of O'DeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Crane v. Young Women's Christian Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Estate of ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Estate of HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Guardianship of MorroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.