State Ex Rel. Udall v. Public Employees Retirement Board
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
Defendants-Petitioners appeal from the Court of Appeals decision finding the Legislative Retirement Plan, NMSA 1978, §§ 10-11-39 to -43 (Repl.Pamp.1992), unconstitutional. The Court of Appeals held that legislative retirement benefits constituted compensation in violation of Article IV, Section 10 of the New Mexico Constitution, which proscribes payment of any other compensation to legislators beyond their per diem and mileage allowance. State ex rel. Udall v. Public Employees Retirement Bd., 118 N.M. 507, 511, 882 P.2d 548, 552 (Ct.App.1994). We issued a "writ of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boryszewski v. BrydgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Espanola Housing Authority v. AtencioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Raton v. SprouleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. BallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
- Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- CITATION BINGO, LTD. v. OttenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Bounds v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. YoungNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Moses v. SkanderaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.