Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Udall v. Public Employees Retirement Board

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1995No. 22279PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROST, Justice.

Defendants-Petitioners appeal from the Court of Appeals decision finding the Legislative Retirement Plan, NMSA 1978, §§ 10-11-39 to -43 (Repl.Pamp.1992), unconstitutional. The Court of Appeals held that legislative retirement benefits constituted compensation in violation of Article IV, Section 10 of the New Mexico Constitution, which proscribes payment of any other compensation to legislators beyond their per diem and mileage allowance. State ex rel. Udall v. Public Employees Retirement Bd., 118 N.M. 507, 511, 882 P.2d 548, 552 (Ct.App.1994). We issued a "writ of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boryszewski v. BrydgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Espanola Housing Authority v. AtencioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. City of Raton v. SprouleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. BallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. CITATION BINGO, LTD. v. OttenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. DuranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Bounds v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. YoungNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Moses v. SkanderaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API