Legal Opinion

State v. Duran

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 1998No. 18,787PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Judge.

{1} Defendant appeals from a judgment and sentence entered after a jury trial, wherein he was convicted of stalking, harassment, and two counts of criminal trespass. We address the following issues on appeal: (1) whether Defendant’s convictions for stalking and harassment violate constitutional double jeopardy protections, (2) whether the New Mexico criminal harassment statute, NMSA 1978, § 30-3A-2 (1993), is unconstitutionally vague, (3) whether Defendant’s convictions were supported by sufficient evidence, and (4) whether Defendant was denied due process of law…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. MoraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. AkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API