State v. Duran
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Judge.
{1} Defendant appeals from a judgment and sentence entered after a jury trial, wherein he was convicted of stalking, harassment, and two counts of criminal trespass. We address the following issues on appeal: (1) whether Defendant’s convictions for stalking and harassment violate constitutional double jeopardy protections, (2) whether the New Mexico criminal harassment statute, NMSA 1978, § 30-3A-2 (1993), is unconstitutionally vague, (3) whether Defendant’s convictions were supported by sufficient evidence, and (4) whether Defendant was denied due process of law…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MoraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. AkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.