Legal Opinion

Wanamaker v. Philadelphia School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1971No. Appeal, No. 645PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the Business Use and Occupancy Tax of Philadelphia, imposed on the use or occupancy of real estate for commercial or industrial activity, is an unequal tax on real estate and thus violates the Uniformity Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution.1 We hold today that the tax in question is a valid privilege tax on the use of such real estate and, hence, is in no sense violative of the uniformity provision.

The facts and history of the case may be summarized as follows:

On June 4, 1970, the Council of the City of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Burnet v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Hylton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1796

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Amidon v. KaneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. F. J. Busse Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. Erie Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Weaver v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. MurphyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API