Billingslea v. Booker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentWilliams, Justice
I am unable to agree with the treatment of the last proposition noted in the maj ority opinion. I believe the trial court should have permitted defendant, Mary Billingslea, to attack the final decree in the Willie Graham probate case. She alleged fraud in the procurement of such decree; if it is in fact void for fraud in its procurement, then Ida Williams never owned all of the lands herein involved and could not have given a valid deed thereto to plaintiffs, and this cause should be reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Defendant alleged and offered to prove that Ida Williams falsely…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Brown v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- McIntosh v. HoltgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Electric Plaster Co. v. Blue Rapids City TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.