Legal Opinion · Dissent

Billingslea v. Booker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1953No. 35698Published

1DissentWilliams, Justice

I am unable to agree with the treatment of the last proposition noted in the maj ority opinion. I believe the trial court should have permitted defendant, Mary Billingslea, to attack the final decree in the Willie Graham probate case. She alleged fraud in the procurement of such decree; if it is in fact void for fraud in its procurement, then Ida Williams never owned all of the lands herein involved and could not have given a valid deed thereto to plaintiffs, and this cause should be reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Defendant alleged and offered to prove that Ida Williams falsely…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Brown v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. McIntosh v. HoltgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Electric Plaster Co. v. Blue Rapids City TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API