Legal Opinion

Kellogg v. Scheuerman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1897No. 2731PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. E. D. Beusok, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Soott, C. J.

This action was brought to recover damr ages for malicious prosecution. The appellant Christian Scheuerman made complaint before a justice of the peace charging the respondent and one Pratley with burglary in entering appellants’ dwelling house. A warrant was issued and the respondent and Pratley were arrested. Pratley was discharged upon a motion of the prosecuting attorney and the justice of the peace discharged respondent, who thereafter brought this action and recovered damages in the sum of $1,500; whereupon this appeal was taken.

It is…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FreidrichWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bruley v. RoseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Trogden v. DeckardIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Folger v. WashburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Rost v. HarrisThe Superior Court of New York City · 1861

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Borg v. BringhurstWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Duffy v. BlakeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. McAllister v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. The Phoenix Insurance Company v. Diamond Plastics CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API