Legal Opinion
Hayden v. Dallas County
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 9, 1940No. 13102PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Justice.
Upon a hearing, appellant’s petition for temporary injunction was overruled, and he has appealed. The subject matter of the suit was a written contract between Dallas County and the Automatic Voting Machine Corporation, dated May 29, 1940, for the lease of eighty voting machines over a four-months period — June 1 to September 30, 1940. Charles E. Hayden, as a taxpaying citizen and property owner, for himself and others similarly situated, sought to restrain the performance of the contract by either party, alleging same to be wholly void and unenforceable. Plaintiff’s petition…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Williams v. Pure Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Houston Canning Co. v. Virginia Can Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Case v. Mills Novelty Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- R. A. Haberman, Jr., Independent of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Gravis, Deceased v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Harper v. AldersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
- C. C. Leasing Corp. v. City of RichmondRichmond City Circuit Court · 1973
- Davis v. JerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1948