Legal Opinion
City of Moundridge v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 19, 2006No. CIV.A.04-940(RWR)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERTS, District Judge.
Eighteen municipalities 1 sued Exxon Mobil Corporation, BP America,- Inc., Cor al Energy Resources, L.P., ChevronTexaco Corporation, and ConocoPhillips Corporation for violations of the antitrust laws including agreeing to artificially inflate the price of natural gas; monopolizing, attempting to monopolize, and conspiring to monopolize; and price discrimination. The cities now seek preliminary injunctive relief to prevent defendants from refusing to sell natural gas for delivery to these cities, and from raising the average wellhead price…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Spadone v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Abdullah v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- In Re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Bors v. AllenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.